Throughout the world, social media
is rising at a rapid rate for many different purposes. Social media is a
powerful tool where individuals have the ability to get information in a matter
of seconds. Websites such as Facebook,
Twitter, and YouTube make it easy to connect to other people or businesses.
However, places like Egypt, Tunisia, and other countries in the Middle East used
Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to advocate protest and revolutions. During the protests
or revolutions people would post pictures, videos or “minute by minute”
tweets. The government in Egypt became fed
up with the uprising, so they disconnected the people from social media in
order to take control. The article states, “Disappointingly, Twitter and Google
have also agreed to help the Syrian government and oppressive regimes by
enforcing rules that censor tweets or blog posts in Syria by blocking them out
within-country”. I was completely
shocked when I read this as the government was disregarding people’s freedom of
speech or human rights. In my opinion, this would not stop the uprising; it
would make people more upset. Although, the article points out that there were
successful revolutions before the telephone; I believe that social media has
made revolutions even easier to occur. People have the ability to make things
happen faster. They are able to post on Facebook and Twitter a date, time and
place to meet. It is easier for people that do not live close to get in touch
by receiving photos or videos instantly from the people that are there. Also,
social media allows the word to get out to more people than the old-fashioned
word of mouth on the streets. Without social media, I do not think that the
revolution in any of the countries mentioned would have been as successful. In
the world we live in today, people would not survive without social media.
People depend way too much on websites such as Facebook and Twitter to get
information about anything instantly.
Good precis; good final comment. mark
ReplyDelete